← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
probiotic metagenome
Instrument
Ion Torrent S5
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
6 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
49225406808
reported
total reads
162472350
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
88
measured
pct q30 bases
47.8
measured
gc content pct
45.9
measured
mean read length
300.3
measured
mean base quality
27.3
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
0.93
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
47.8
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
0.93
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
16 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0