Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This large-scale human amplicon dataset on an Illumina MiSeq generated 233 million reads with 91% Q30 bases, enabling population-scale microbiome or genomic studies across many individuals. Researchers investigating human microbiota diversity, disease associations, or population-level variation will benefit from sufficient depth for comprehensive community profiling and rare-variant detection. The uniform Q30 quality supports stringent filtering for downstream analyses.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0