← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
76/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
NextSeq 550
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
18 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
800565451070
reported
total reads
2631826436
reported
mean coverage
258.2
extrapolated
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
98
measured
pct q30 bases
98
measured
gc content pct
42.6
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
29.5
measured
adapter content pct
17.41
measured
duplication rate pct
29.86
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 76/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
258.2
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
98
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
29.86
measured
×0.5
32%
adapter content pct
17.41
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
32 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0