PRJNA512876

BioProject first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

56/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

WGS with significant library quality issues, grading F. Adapter content at 39.65% (weight-0.4 metric, scored 0/100) and duplication at 36.4% (weight-0.5 metric, scored 11/100) are red flags indicating compromised library prep. Requires aggressive trimming and quality-control scrutiny; marginal for reuse without independent validation.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron

Instrument

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

7 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5415164114 reported

total reads 17931007 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 97.1 measured

pct q30 bases 92.6 measured

gc content pct 42.7 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 35.7 measured

adapter content pct 39.65 measured

duplication rate pct 36.4 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 56/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.6 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 36.4 measured ×0.5 11%

adapter content pct 39.65 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0