← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 6 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
6 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
ATAC-seq
Organism
Acinonyx jubatus
Instrument
DNBSEQ-G400
Platform
DNBSEQ
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1,642 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
70493793517685
reported
total reads
241714246027
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
97.1
measured
pct q30 bases
92.3
measured
gc content pct
41.5
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
35.7
measured
adapter content pct
7.09
measured
duplication rate pct
14.24
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ATAC-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
92.3
measured
×1
100%
QC cost
8 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0