Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2500 whole-genome sequencing of Escherichia coli with 417 million short reads and extreme 7,362× mean coverage of 33.9 Gb at high quality (96.4% Q20, 94.4% Q30). Exceptional depth far exceeds typical bacterial genome needs; useful for benchmarking variant-calling algorithms and validation workflows.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0