Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Anaerobic bacterium ([Clostridium] hylemonae DSM 15053) bulk RNA-seq on HiSeq 4000 produces 10.6 billion bases (107 million reads) with excellent quality (97.6% Q30 bases), enabling accurate transcript quantification. The high quality supports investigation of gene expression under anaerobic or other specialized metabolic conditions relevant to human microbiota ecology.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0