Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq of Peptacetobacter hiranonis (prokaryotic). Grade B (83/100) — usable with caveats. Duplication reaches 79.45% (measured, scored 0/100), a severe concern that inflates apparent expression levels and biases DE analysis; however, quality bases (97.9% Q30, 39.9 mean quality, all measured) and low adapters remain strong, making data salvageable if abundance estimates are normalized for duplication.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0