← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
chromatin-conformation
Organism
Castanea mollissima
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 1500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
272 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1300511714294
reported
total reads
4083763817
reported
QC cost
0 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently