Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Food-production metagenome amplicon-seq on MiSeq yields 5.8 billion bases (13.5 million reads) with moderate quality (86.7% Q30 bases) but notably elevated N content (5.62%), indicating some sequencing uncertainty. The dataset captures microbial communities in food environments; elevated N content warrants quality filtering, but the size permits microbiota profiling relevant to food safety and fermentation studies.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0