← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Gambusia holbrooki
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
534 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2255261987550
reported
total reads
8601184028
reported
n content pct
0.006
measured
pct q20 bases
96.1
measured
pct q30 bases
92.6
measured
gc content pct
39.4
measured
mean read length
125
measured
mean base quality
36.1
measured
adapter content pct
26.81
measured
duplication rate pct
1.78
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
92.6
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
36.1
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
26.81
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
1.78
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
20 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0