PRJNA531273

BioProject first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 5 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

5 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

30 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 37983877508 reported

total reads 138437505 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 95.5 measured

pct q30 bases 89.8 measured

gc content pct 47.5 measured

mean read length 141.1 measured

mean base quality 33.7 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 1.77 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.8 measured ×1 99%

duplication rate pct 1.77 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 5 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0