PRJNA531679

BioProject first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

97/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This human whole exome sequencing dataset from HiSeq 4000 totals 465.2 billion bases with good quality (88.5% Q30). The dataset enables targeted investigation of protein-coding variants.

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

15 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 465216041307 reported

total reads 1538569800 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 94.8 measured

pct q30 bases 88.5 measured

gc content pct 38.8 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 37.3 measured

adapter content pct 1.19 measured

duplication rate pct 6.26 measured

mean target coverage 7503.5 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 97/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 7503.5 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 88.5 measured ×1 93%

duplication rate pct 6.26 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 1.19 measured ×0.4 99%

QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0