← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Abax parallelepipedus
Instrument
454 GS FLX
Platform
ABI_SOLID
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
50,162 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1968016618749058
reported
total reads
8753076022157.001
reported
n content pct
1.437
measured
pct q20 bases
94.9
measured
pct q30 bases
93
measured
gc content pct
35.2
measured
mean read length
36
measured
mean base quality
37.9
measured
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
duplication rate pct
6.67
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
93
measured
×1
100%
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
20 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0