Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human gut metagenome bulk RNA-seq on MiSeq generates 2.3 billion bases (7.76 million reads) with high quality (95.6% Q30 bases), capturing expressed microbial transcripts. The smaller dataset suits targeted investigation of dominant organisms' functional expression; high quality enables confident detection of condition-specific gene expression in the gut microbiome.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0