Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Amplicon targeting (human, NextSeq 550). Grade A (100/100) — exceptional amplicon data. Massive sequencing depth (3.2B reads, 1921× target coverage extrapolated) with all measured metrics excellent (92.8% Q30, zero adapters, negligible N-content); high duplication (77.43%) is offset by extreme oversampling, making this dataset ideal for rare-variant detection and deep taxonomic or allelic profiling.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0