Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Amplicon sequencing (16S/ITS-like) in C. elegans. Grade A (100/100) — high-quality amplicon data suitable for reuse. Although duplication is elevated at 30.34% (expected for amplicon, minimal impact on abundance estimates), all quality metrics measured and strong: 91.9% Q30, negligible adapter, and sufficient depth (56k× target coverage, extrapolated) for robust taxonomic profiling.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0