Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq of Mus musculus. Grade B (83/100) — severely compromised by adapter contamination. Adapter content at 51.35% (measured, scored 0/100) is extremely high and will introduce systematic bias into expression quantification and differential abundance tests; quality bases (93.1% Q30, measured) are strong, but ~half the reads are non-biological sequence, requiring aggressive preprocessing or remapping on adapter-trimmed reads.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0