Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Targeted 16S amplicon sequencing of Escherichia coli via Illumina NovaSeq 6000, yielding 1.3 million reads across 391 million bases with good quality (96.2% Q20, 91.9% Q30). Suitable for bacterial strain delineation, population genetics, and pathotype characterization; the 48.2% GC and zero N-content reflect pure culture purity. The moderate read count may limit resolution of rare allelic variants but provides ample depth for core genome SNP calling and phylogenetic placement within E. coli species.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0