PRJNA556325

BioProject first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

77/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Sus scrofa

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

9 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 128321099506 reported

total reads 424904303 reported

n content pct 0.005 measured

pct q20 bases 98.6 measured

pct q30 bases 95.9 measured

gc content pct 58.9 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 39.4 measured

adapter content pct 22.25 measured

duplication rate pct 47.92 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 77/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.9 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 39.4 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 22.25 measured ×0.4 0%

duplication rate pct 47.92 measured ×0.4 60%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0