Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA557314

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

96/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Abalone (Haliotis discus hannai) RNA-seq on HiSeq 2500 with 625 million 101 bp reads at 95.6% Q20 and 91.2% Q30 across 126 Gb delivers substantial coverage for mollusk transcriptomics. The 43.5% GC is typical for abalone; sufficient depth for detecting condition-specific isoforms and rare transcripts.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Haliotis discus hannai
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
24 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 126255216852 reported
total reads 625025826 reported
n content pct 0.005 measured
pct q20 bases 95.6 measured
pct q30 bases 91.2 measured
gc content pct 43.5 measured
mean read length 101 measured
mean base quality 35.7 measured
adapter content pct 5.69 measured
duplication rate pct 32.74 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 96/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91.2 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 35.7 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 5.69 measured ×0.4 80%
duplication rate pct 32.74 measured ×0.4 94%
QC cost 15 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 80