Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S amplicon survey of the red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) via Illumina MiSeq, delivering 280,000 reads with excellent sequence fidelity (98.3% Q20, 94.2% Q30) and zero N content. Characterizes crustacean-associated microbiota; the minimal quality compromises and balanced 50.2% GC make this dataset particularly suitable for downstream ASV inference and phylogenetic placement. The smaller read count may limit statistical power for rare taxon detection but poses no technical barrier to community profiling in this arthropod model.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0