PRJNA559484

BioProject first seen 2022

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 7 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

7 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

ChIP-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

GridION

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

hybrid (short+long)

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

259 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 865802585209 reported

total reads 2979197779 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 98 measured

pct q30 bases 95.9 measured

gc content pct 47.5 measured

mean read length 4323.3 measured

mean base quality 83 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 24.21 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.9 measured ×1 100%

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0