Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S amplicon profiling of an unspecified metagenome via Illumina MiSeq, yielding 7.4 million reads (3.7 billion bases) with moderate quality (93.9% Q20, 90.4% Q30) and zero N content. Characterizes microbial community composition in environmental or clinical specimens; the 51.9% GC and moderate base fidelity support taxonomy assignment and abundance estimation of dominant taxa. Adequate read depth for preliminary diversity surveys, though statistical power for rare taxa detection may be limited; quality is sufficient for standard amplicon workflows without aggressive trimming.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0