Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Lactobacillus crispatus via NextSeq 500, producing 21 million short reads (6.1 billion bases) with good quality (94.9% Q20, 89.9% Q30) and zero N content. Enables comprehensive genome assembly and pan-genome analysis of this probiotic and urogenital tract-colonizing lactic acid bacterium; the low 39.4% GC is characteristic of Lactobacillus species. The modest read count and NextSeq chemistry provide adequate coverage for high-quality closed-genome reconstruction and identification of strain-specific plasmids and antimicrobial peptide loci relevant to probiotic selection.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0