PRJNA563239

BioProject first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Gut amplicon metagenomics with exemplary short-read quality: Q30 at 90.9% and zero adapter content drive an A-grade. High duplication (95.78%) is amplicon-appropriate and expected. Prime reuse candidate for microbial taxonomy.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

22 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 326875908 reported

total reads 783257 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 94.8 measured

pct q30 bases 90.9 measured

gc content pct 54.7 measured

mean read length 416.6 measured

mean base quality 36.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 95.78 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90.9 measured ×1 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 2 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0