Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S amplicon profiling of mouse gut microbiota via Illumina MiSeq, comprising 11.6 million reads and 2.7 billion bases with good quality (98% Q20, 91.9% Q30) and the typical 55.7% GC of rodent fecal flora. Characterizes murine intestinal bacterial communities with sufficient depth for alpha/beta diversity assessment and taxon abundance estimation; the zero N-content and high sequence fidelity support sensitive ASV inference and rare biosphere detection. Well-suited for host-microbiota studies and microbiota engineering experiments in laboratory mice.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0