Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S amplicon profiling of mouse gut microbiota via Illumina MiSeq, comprising 2 million reads (511 million bases) with outstanding quality (99% Q20, 94.9% Q30) and zero N content. Provides microbiota characterization in laboratory mice with exceptional sequence fidelity; the 53.4% GC reflects typical murine fecal community composition. Though the read count is modest, the flawless quality enables reliable taxonomy assignment and alpha/beta diversity inference without QC filtering overhead, suitable for small-scale intervention studies or longitudinal microbiota tracking.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0