PRJNA574439

BioProject first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

74/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This metagenomics amplicon dataset from MiSeq totals 93.8 million bases but with very poor quality (82.1% Q30 bases and elevated N content at 1.435%). The small size and poor metrics severely limit utility.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

metagenome

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

18 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 93843689 reported

total reads 297610 reported

n content pct 1.435 measured

pct q20 bases 91 measured

pct q30 bases 82.1 measured

gc content pct 52.3 measured

mean read length 166.7 measured

mean base quality 33.4 measured

adapter content pct 0.26 measured

duplication rate pct 74.51 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 74/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82.1 measured ×1 61%

adapter content pct 0.26 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 2 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0