Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
85/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Amplicon metagenome (crustacean). Grade B (85/100) — good amplicon data with minor reservations. Q30 bases at 85.5% (measured) are slightly below the ideal 90%+, marginally reducing confidence in low-abundance variant calls; duplication is high (86.68%) but expected and managed well in amplicon workflows, and read length (408.6 bp, measured) is favorable for deep sequencing.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0