← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
ATAC-seq
Organism
Gossypium arboreum
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
BGISEQ
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
113 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
3350059426573
reported
total reads
10567635946
reported
n content pct
0.049
measured
pct q20 bases
97.6
measured
pct q30 bases
92.9
measured
gc content pct
35.3
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
37.5
measured
adapter content pct
0.07
measured
duplication rate pct
10.05
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ATAC-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
92.9
measured
×1
100%
QC cost
46 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0