PRJNA577465

BioProject first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

65/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This bacterial WGS from HiSeq 2500 totals 2.87 billion bases with elevated N content (0.657%) and moderate quality (82% Q30). The dataset provides genomic information for this acetic acid bacterium.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Acetobacter senegalensis

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

3 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2869660682 reported

total reads 14206241 reported

n content pct 0.657 measured

pct q20 bases 94.2 measured

pct q30 bases 82 measured

gc content pct 50.7 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 33.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 24.94 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 65/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82 measured ×1 60%

duplication rate pct 24.94 measured ×0.5 47%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0