Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk transcriptome of Homo sapiens via Illumina HiSeq 2500, yielding 479 million short reads (144.9 billion bases) with exceptional quality (98.2% Q20, 94.6% Q30) and zero N content. Supports comprehensive gene expression profiling, isoform discovery, and splice-junction analysis across human tissues or cell types; the 51.7% GC and pristine base fidelity enable sensitive quantification across the full dynamic range of transcript expression. This exceptionally clean, high-depth dataset is ideal for transcriptome atlases and discovery of tissue-restricted or allele-specific expression patterns.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0