Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA594799

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

96/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Large-scale human RNA-seq dataset from Illumina HiSeq 3000 with relatively short reads (49.6 bp) and high quality (98.1% Q20), enabling transcriptome-wide expression profiling across many samples. Short read length requires sophisticated alignment strategies to minimize ambiguous mapping, particularly for genes with repetitive sequences or pseudogenes.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 3000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
8 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 16673639903 reported
total reads 336420067 reported
n content pct 0.124 measured
pct q20 bases 98.1 measured
pct q30 bases 94.5 measured
gc content pct 45.6 measured
mean read length 49.6 measured
mean base quality 38.5 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 39.78 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 96/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.5 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 38.5 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 39.78 measured ×0.4 78%
QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 50