PRJNA595915

BioProject first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

58/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This multidrug-resistant bacterium WGS from NextSeq 500 totals 107.6 billion bases with good quality (82.8% Q30) and notably high GC content (62.6%). The large dataset enables study of antibiotic resistance mechanisms.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Acinetobacter baumannii

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

104 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 107564689426 reported

total reads 358258516 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 89.5 measured

pct q30 bases 82.8 measured

gc content pct 62.6 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 32.3 measured

adapter content pct 26.57 measured

duplication rate pct 11 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 58/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82.8 measured ×1 64%

duplication rate pct 11 measured ×0.5 91%

adapter content pct 26.57 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 38 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0