Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA596111

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

96/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
pond metagenome
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
8 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 38415323462 reported
total reads 255254778 reported
n content pct 0.354 measured
pct q20 bases 98.9 measured
pct q30 bases 97 measured
gc content pct 59.6 measured
mean read length 75.3 measured
mean base quality 39.5 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 41.45 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 96/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 39.5 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 41.45 measured ×0.4 75%
QC cost 1.2 min compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 97