PRJNA600063

BioProject first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

BGISEQ-500

Platform

BGISEQ

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

7 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 909012783372 reported

total reads 4944748326 reported

mean coverage 293.2 extrapolated

n content pct 0.013 measured

pct q20 bases 95.9 measured

pct q30 bases 91.1 measured

gc content pct 40.6 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 38.5 measured

adapter content pct 0.07 measured

duplication rate pct 3.48 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 293.2 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 91.1 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 3.48 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.07 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0