Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA600240

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Abalone (Haliotis fulgens) bulk-RNA-seq on NovaSeq 6000 with 997.2 million 101 bp reads at 98.7% Q20 and 95.9% Q30 across 201 Gb provides exceptional coverage. The 45.8% GC and high base quality enable comprehensive transcriptome characterization for investigating developmental patterning, reproduction, and environmental responses.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Haliotis fulgens
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
39 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 201227730675 reported
total reads 997179077 reported
n content pct 0.002 measured
pct q20 bases 98.7 measured
pct q30 bases 95.9 measured
gc content pct 45.8 measured
mean read length 101 measured
mean base quality 36.3 measured
adapter content pct 1.61 measured
duplication rate pct 24.53 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.9 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 36.3 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 1.61 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 24.53 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 12 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 80