← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
49/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
NextSeq 500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
20 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
5554499328
reported
total reads
66124992
reported
n content pct
0.009
measured
pct q20 bases
89.7
measured
pct q30 bases
84.7
measured
gc content pct
49.9
measured
mean read length
59
measured
mean base quality
32.4
measured
adapter content pct
32.09
measured
duplication rate pct
37.06
measured
mean target coverage
89.6
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 49/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
84.7
measured
×1
74%
adapter content pct
32.09
measured
×0.5
0%
QC cost
26 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0