Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Targeted exome capture (WES) in Astropanax mannii. Grade C (74/100) — usable but compromised. Extreme adapter contamination (81.15%, measured) is the primary liability; this threatens variant calling accuracy and requires aggressive adapter trimming or remapping against trimmed reads. Secondary concern is moderate duplication (17.8%), but quality metrics (100% Q20, Q30 bases) are strong; reuse is feasible with preprocessing attention.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0