Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S amplicon sequencing of Mus musculus via Illumina MiniSeq, yielding 9.3 million reads with moderate quality (93% Q20, 89.6% Q30) but notable 0.506% N-content elevation, unusual for amplicon data. Characterizes murine intestinal or other tissue-associated microbiota; the higher N proportion may indicate adapter read-through or contamination and warrants preprocessing inspection. The 48% GC composition is consistent with laboratory mouse microbiota and the read depth permits community profiling and OTU assignment.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0