Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-exome sequencing of Mus musculus via Illumina HiSeq 4000, generating 413 million short reads (123 billion bases) with high quality (97.6% Q20, 93.3% Q30). Enables variant discovery across coding sequences in mouse models of human disease; the 52.3% GC and minimal N-content (0.003%) provide robust on-target coverage for exome-wide association and functional variant annotation. WES depth supports calling rare and de novo variants in model organisms with sufficient power for genetic screening and phenotype-genotype association studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0