← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
73/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Ovis aries
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
10 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
40370719736
reported
total reads
497527424
reported
n content pct
0.002
measured
pct q20 bases
97.3
measured
pct q30 bases
95.8
measured
gc content pct
50.8
measured
mean read length
74
measured
mean base quality
34.8
measured
adapter content pct
19.83
measured
duplication rate pct
59.64
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 73/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
95.8
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
34.8
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
19.83
measured
×0.4
1%
duplication rate pct
59.64
measured
×0.4
34%
QC cost
30 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0