PRJNA61101

BioProject first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

57/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This bumblebee WGS from Genome Analyzer IIx totals 53 billion bases with moderate quality (73.5% Q30). The dataset provides genomic sequence for this important pollinator species.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Bombus impatiens

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

3 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 53001313304 reported

total reads 213714973 reported

n content pct 0.105 measured

pct q20 bases 83.8 measured

pct q30 bases 73.5 measured

gc content pct 37.3 measured

mean read length 124 measured

mean base quality 28.1 measured

adapter content pct 0.08 measured

duplication rate pct 4.88 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 57/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 73.5 measured ×1 18%

duplication rate pct 4.88 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.08 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 6 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0