PRJNA611920

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Clouded leopard (Neofelis nebulosa) WGS using BGISEQ-500 (DNBseq platform) produced 12.9 billion 150+ bp reads at 97.9% Q20 and 89.9% Q30 across 1.09 Tb. The 44.6% GC is typical of felid genomes; substantial depth enables reference-genome assembly, population structure analysis, and conservation genetics for this endangered species.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Neofelis nebulosa

Instrument

BGISEQ-500

Platform

BGISEQ

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

22 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1091323122377 reported

total reads 12896954773 reported

n content pct 0.034 measured

pct q20 bases 97.9 measured

pct q30 bases 89.9 measured

gc content pct 44.6 measured

mean read length 94.8 measured

mean base quality 34.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.38 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.9 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.38 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0