← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
human metagenome
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
641 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
41740804571
reported
total reads
69945752
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
90.4
measured
pct q30 bases
80.4
measured
gc content pct
55.7
measured
mean read length
299.3
measured
mean base quality
33.5
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
95.53
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 68/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
80.4
measured
×1
52%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
7 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0