Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S amplicon survey of rat gut microbiota via Illumina MiniSeq short-read sequencing, generating ~8.5 million reads across 2.6 billion bases with strong base quality (95.5% Q30). The dataset supports community composition and microbial diversity analyses in rodent intestinal microbiomes; note the elevated 55.7% GC content typical of fecal bacterial populations. High sequence reliability (96.4% Q20) makes this suitable for amplicon-based taxonomy and OTU clustering without substantial QC filtering.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0