Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S amplicon survey of Mycobacteriaceae bacterium via Illumina MiSeq, producing 12 million reads (3.5 billion bases) with high quality (97.7% Q20, 96.8% Q30) and the elevated 58.2% GC typical of this family. Enables species-level identification and strain-level discrimination within Mycobacteriaceae; the low N-content (0.025%) and excellent base fidelity support precise phylogenetic placement and allele frequency inference. This dataset is well-suited for taxonomic surveys and molecular epidemiology of mycobacterial infections.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0