← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 5 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
5 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
ATAC-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
AB SOLiD System 2.0
Platform
ABI_SOLID
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
57,368 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
169261776903886
reported
total reads
1197059644710
reported
n content pct
2.439
measured
pct q20 bases
58.5
measured
pct q30 bases
51.3
measured
gc content pct
68.4
measured
mean read length
27
measured
mean base quality
20.4
measured
adapter content pct
0.38
measured
duplication rate pct
22.22
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ATAC-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
51.3
measured
×1
0%
QC cost
10 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0