← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
446 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
276952643603
reported
total reads
5521566012
reported
n content pct
5.229
measured
pct q20 bases
92.9
measured
pct q30 bases
86.2
measured
gc content pct
51.2
measured
mean read length
50
measured
mean base quality
35.7
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
67.67
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 87/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
86.2
measured
×1
81%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
9 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0